This study assesses the potential for purpose-grown bioenergy feedstocks to meet the United States Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) Grand Challenge targets. A combined life cycle assessment, techno-economic analysis, geospatial modeling, and evolutionary optimization framework was applied to evaluate the county-level deployment of nine feedstocks across seven land classifications. The findings underscore critical trade-offs between land use, fuel production costs, and emissions reductions in achieving national SAF targets. In cost-optimized scenarios, sorghum and miscanthus comprise most of the production (together >95%), achieving minimum fuel selling prices as low as 3. 24 gallon–1. Cultivation land-minimizing scenarios favor algae exclusively, reducing land use to 0. 5% of the contiguous U. S. , but with higher fuel prices and emissions. Emissions-optimized scenarios are largely composed of miscanthus (>99%), achieving life-cycle emissions below 5 gCO2-eq MJ–1. The breakeven carbon price optimized scenarios deploy a mix of miscanthus (86%), sorghum (13%), and soy (1%) ; balancing low fuel cost and emissions with a breakeven carbon price of 161 tCO2-eq–1. Across all cases, feedstock yields, biomass-to-fuel conversion efficiencies, and spatial heterogeneity strongly influence feasibility. These results highlight the importance of coordinated optimization strategies to enable cost-effective, low-carbon SAF production and support efforts to inform energy policy, supply chain planning, and commercialization pathways.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Braden J. Limb
Colorado State University
Jack P. Smith
Steve Simske
Environmental Science & Technology
Colorado State University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Limb et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68af5d63ad7bf08b1eae0850 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5c05842
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: