This paper explores the conceptual relationship between Tolkien’s notion of Faërie, Jung's Collective Unconscious, and Campbell's Underworld, focusing on how Tolkien frames the mythic realm not through structural universals but through narrative particularity. While Jung and Campbell emphasize recurring archetypes and transformative patterns, Tolkien's Faërie resists generalization. It is not a space to be decoded but one to be inhabited - marked by aesthetic integrity, ontological strangeness, and irreducible detail. Faërie does not symbolize psychic transformation; it stages an encounter with the unfamiliar on its own terms. Drawing on Tolkien's literary theory and fiction, this paper argues that his contribution lies in a phenomenology of the story world, where enchantment arises from specificity, not from alignment with symbolic templates. In this way, Faërie reframes some myths as sites of artistic and psychological participation grounded in the singularity of imaginative form.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Michael Barros
The International Journal of Humanities & Social Studies
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Michael Barros (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68af5d69ad7bf08b1eae0bbb — DOI: https://doi.org/10.24940/theijhss/2025/v13/i4/hs2504-006