Karl Popper (1902-1994) is one of the most eminent philosophers of the 20th century which reconfigured the scientific method through the creation of the project (critical spirit) as an alternative to the model of certainty and traditional verification, as contributions from the philosophy of science tendencies Doughanism in Both Natural and Human Sciences, We Aim, Through this philosophical approval Attempt to establish a new Critical Epistemology, The Principle of Open, Critical, Monetary, To Achieve the Maximum Degree of Accuracy and Scientific Certainsy to Understand the Human Experience in the Field of Multiple Cultural Perceptions, and Social Systems Through the Draft Critical Objectivity in Front of the Bets and Challenges The humanities, and social sciences to enhance Critical Dynamics and overcome the risks of current ideological stagnation, that forces us to present the following problem: How did Karl Popper establish an open rationality as an alternative to false neutrality? What is the truth of human? The answer to this problem confirms that man has always occupied the centrality of the epistemic field of humanities, and social and socially based on the controversy of the transcendent and realistic idealism within the dualism of being and nature, but with the end of the nineteenth century the human being occupied the field of experimental studies towards objective knowledge through the establishment of the ego’s ego through self-experience, which forced humanities and social sciences from the birth of modern science to this day to this day to this day to this day The imperative to overcome all classical curricula and studies based on ancient Greek perceptions, and the intellectual and systematic transition towards the scientific situation, to achieve its presence in the cognitive field through an attempt to establish an accurate objective independence by adopting the experimental approach like other modern science as "the" path leading to revealing the truth in science by a group of general rules that dominate the progress of the mind, and determines its operations until it reaches a known result".
Bensahla et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: