Abstract: Transregionalism, characterized by flexible, non-institutional cooperation across regions, contrasts with interregionalism's structured, rule-based interactions. New bilateralism, on the other hand, emerging post-Cold War, extends beyond economic governance to include strategic, security, and cultural dimensions, bypassing institutional constraints. This special issue examines the conceptual and practical complementarity of these frameworks in Middle Eastern–Southeast Asian interactions. Despite weak regional organizations and uneven intra-regional power distribution, transregionalism and new bilateralism create adaptable, issue-specific collaboration channels. Key regional actors—Türkiye, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Malaysia, Indonesia, and Singapore—leverage these mechanisms to engage in strategic partnerships outside great-power dominance. This issue highlights the efficacy of non-institutional, pragmatic diplomacy in addressing contemporary geopolitical complexities. Case studies, such as the Indonesia-UAE and Malaysia-Saudi Arabia agreements, illustrate how these frameworks enable dynamic, sustainable cooperation. The study ultimately argues that transregionalism and new bilateralism offer viable alternatives to formal institutions, empowering small and middle powers to navigate evolving global and regional challenges.
Baba et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: