Longleaf pine forests are economically important habitats that stabilize and enrich the soil and store carbon over long periods. When mixed with oaks, these forests provide an abundance of lichen habitats. The tree canopy lichens promote greater moisture capture and retention and encourage canopy insects. Ground lichens limit some vascular plant germination and growth, promoting a more open and healthy pine community. There is a longstanding mutualistic relationship between longleaf pine habitat and lichens. Longleaf pine habitat has a long history of natural summer burning, which promotes a diverse understory and limits tree densities. Lichen diversity exceeds vascular plant diversity in many mature longleaf pine habitats, yet information on the impacts of prescribed fire on lichen species in these habitats is limited. We assessed lichen diversity and abundance before and after a prescribed ground fire in a longleaf pine/wiregrass habitat near Ocala, Florida. Pre-burn, we found greater lichen abundance and diversity on hardwoods, primarily oak species, than on pines. Post-burn, lichen abundance on hardwoods dropped overall by 28%. Lichen abundance on conifers dropped overall by 94%. Ground lichen species were basically eliminated, with a 99.5% loss. Our study provides insights into retaining lichen diversity after a prescribed burn. Hardwood trees, whether alive or standing dead, help retain lichen biodiversity after burning, whereas conifer trees do not support as many species. Landscapes may need to be actively managed by raking pine needle litter away from ground lichen beds, moistening the ground, or removing some lichen material before the burn and returning it to the site post-fire. Based on these results, we suggest retaining some oaks and conducting burns in a mosaic pattern that retains unburned areas. This will allow for lichens to recover between burns, significantly enhancing biodiversity and the ecological health of these longleaf pine communities.
Rosentreter et al. (Thu,) studied this question.