ABSTRACT Introduction This study explores the collaborative co‐design process for developing a weekly meal box tailored for individuals with neurological conditions. Recognising the critical role of nutrition for this community, the research addresses the challenges posed by cognitive and physical impairments in meal preparation. Methods Through two co‐design workshops involving consumers, healthcare providers and industry experts, insights were gathered on dietary preferences, nutritional needs and practical challenges. Results The workshops emphasised the importance of convenient, easy‐to‐prepare meals with simple instructions, flexibility and customisability. Consumers expressed preferences for convenient, easy‐to‐prepare meals with simple, easy‐to‐follow recipe instructions that align with optimal dietary patterns and taste preferences. Health and industry experts emphasised the importance of flexibility/customisability, ease of access and meal preparation. A prototype meal box was developed and tested in a simulation event, revealing positive feedback and areas for improvement. Participants appreciated the pre‐prepared ingredients and reported increased confidence in cooking. Conclusion By involving both consumers and health and industry experts in the design process, this study contributes to the design of meal box solutions that have real potential to improve the quality of life for those managing neurological conditions through nutrition. The co‐design approach ensured the meal box met the specific needs of the target group, promoting sustainability and practical application. Future research will focus on refining the prototype and evaluating its effectiveness in a broader pilot study. This study underscores the importance of user‐centred design in creating viable nutritional solutions for individuals with neurological impairments. Patient and Public Contribution People with lived experience of a neurological condition, their carers, health providers and industry experts contributed throughout the design process and the preliminary simulation event. Our thematic analysis was conducted by someone with lived experience of a neurological condition, who also contributed to the writing and reviewing of the manuscript.
Rees et al. (Thu,) studied this question.