Background: Outpatient operative hysteroscopy is a minimally invasive procedure widely used for the diagnosis and treatment of intrauterine pathologies, including intrauterine adhesions (IUAs), which significantly affect fertility. Despite its therapeutic potential, the procedure itself may predispose patients to de novo adhesion formation. This review evaluates the effectiveness of anti-adhesion gels, particularly hyaluronic-acid-based formulations, in preventing IUAs and improving reproductive outcomes after outpatient operative hysteroscopy. Materials and Methods: A systematic search was performed in PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, and Web of Science for studies published between January 2020 and May 2025. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were defined using PICO guidelines. Relevant studies were screened and selected by two independent reviewers. Results: Anti-adhesion gels, especially hyaluronic acid and its derivatives, were associated with a lower recurrence of IUAs and improved reproductive outcomes. Combination therapies, such as hyaluronic acid gel with intrauterine devices (IUDs), showed better efficacy than monotherapy. Several studies also reported increased endometrial thickness, higher implantation rates, and improved pregnancy outcomes, although live birth rates remained inconsistent. Conclusions: Hyaluronic-acid-based anti-adhesion gels appear effective in reducing postoperative adhesion formation and enhancing reproductive outcomes in outpatient hysteroscopy. The best results are seen with multimodal preventive strategies. However, heterogeneity across studies highlights the need for standardized, prospective, randomized controlled trials to establish optimal clinical use.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Alessandro Messina
Safae El Motarajji
Ilaria Giovannini
Reproductive Medicine
University of Turin
Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro”
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Maggiore della Carita
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Messina et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68bb3efd2b87ece8dc957afb — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/reprodmed6030022