Insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) are the most impactful and cost-effective control tool against malaria. ITNs are primarily distributed through triennial mass campaigns across Africa, though overall ITN use remains modest in many areas as most ITNs do not last three years. In times of funding constraints and a lack of economic alternative antimalarial interventions it is unclear whether disease control could be best improved by distributing more effective ITNs (e.g. dual active-ingredient ITNs) and/or deploying nets more frequently. There are increased calls to improve allocation of resources through sub-national tailoring of interventions, though benefits will depend on how long people use ITNs and how this varies between regions. Here we estimate systematic differences in use and access of ITNs sub-nationally for six countries, Burkina Faso, Ghana, Malawi, Mali, Mozambique and Senegal. These estimates are used to calibrate a Plasmodium falciparum transmission dynamics model to generate sub-national estimates of ITN use and cases averted under different ITN distribution strategies. On average, people use their ITNs for 21 months, though this varies substantially between regions from 12 to 38 months. Shifting from triennial to biennial campaigns is estimated to lead to mean population use across all regions increasing from 41.7% to 49.6%. No regions of the 146 investigated were estimated to maintain use over 80% even under biennial distribution, though switching to dual active-ingredient ITNs would likely avert more cases under present distribution frequencies. The framework highlights how routinely collected data can aid policymakers in tailoring disease control programmes at sub-national levels.
Glover et al. (Fri,) studied this question.