Adopting a critically phenomenological approach, this article explores how John Cage’s famed 4’33” (1952) lends itself to a politics of hesitation. Reading Cage together with philosopher Alia Al-Saji, the essay explores how Cagean silence operates by interrupting sedimented habits of listening to (1) denaturalize the automaticity of listening, (2) change the directionality of perception toward the unintended, and (3) critically implicate the listener in the act of listening. Just as Al-Saji describes hesitation as a felt, temporal interval that opens possibilities to see and feel otherwise, so, too, does Cage offer silence as a duration capable of transforming listening into “something else.” By approaching Cage’s silence as a form of phenomenological hesitation, the essay ultimately emphasizes the critical and ethical import of his work.
Molly Kelly (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: