Surface ozone pollution poses a significant threat to human health and ecosystems. However, its highly variable spatiotemporal distribution, especially at hourly scales across China, complicates effective risk management. This variability presents substantial challenges for accurate estimation and forecasting, underscoring the importance of evaluating current hourly surface ozone estimation methods. Therefore, this study collaboratively evaluated the performance of chemical transport model simulations and satellite-based estimates of hourly surface ozone concentrations over mainland China in 2019. Using data from 3185 ground monitoring stations operated by the Ministry of Ecology and Environment, as well as six independent observation sites in Hong Kong, Xianghe, Nam Co, Akedala, Longfengshan, and Waliguan, this study found that both datasets exhibited systematic biases and lacked spatiotemporal consistency. The Community Atmosphere Model with Chemistry simulation results exhibited an average relative bias of 23.17%, generally overestimated ozone concentrations in high-altitude regions, but outperformed the satellite-based estimates at the independent sites, while consistently underestimating ozone concentrations in densely populated urban areas. In contrast, the satellite-based estimates performed better in regions with dense monitoring sites, with mean biases typically within 10% of observations, but their accuracy was limited in remote areas due to sparse ground-based calibration. It is particularly noteworthy that both datasets showed deficiencies in capturing extremely high-value events, nighttime ozone variations, and dynamic transport processes, underscoring challenges in the representation of photochemical processes in the model and in the design of satellite estimation algorithms. The results highlight the importance of optimizing model parameterization schemes, improving satellite estimation algorithms, and integrating multi-source data to enhance the accuracy and stability of hourly ozone estimates. This study provides multi-scale quantitative insights into the relative strengths and limitations of different ozone estimation methods, laying a solid scientific foundation for future data integration, regional air quality management, and policy development.
Zhou et al. (Fri,) studied this question.