Objective To conduct a meta‐analysis comparing the outcomes of vacuum‐assisted access sheath (VAAS) mini‐percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mPCNL) vs conventional access sheath (CAS) mPCNL. Methods A systematic review and meta‐analysis was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, with registration in PROSPERO (CRD42024619780). A comprehensive search identified comparative studies (randomised controlled trials and observational studies). The primary outcomes included operating time, stone‐free rate (SFR) and complications. Secondary outcomes included transfusion rates, haemoglobin deficit, and length of hospital stay. Data were analysed using Review Manager V5.4, with quality of evidence assessed using the Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) tool. Results Fourteen studies with 2510 patients (1298 in the VAAS and 1212 in the CAS mPCNL groups) were included. VAAS mPCNL significantly reduced operating time, by 17.45 (13.12–21.79) min ( P 0.9). Conclusion The use of VAAS mPCNL offers significant advantages over CAS mPCNL, including shorter operating time, improved stone clearance, and reduced complications. These findings support the use of VAAS mPCNL in managing kidney stones, with further high‐quality studies recommended.
Adhoni et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: