ABSTRACT The paper examines the role of women directors in climate risk disclosure using a comprehensive measure in an international setting. Grounded in stakeholder orientation, resource dependence, and legitimacy theories, the paper analyzes 26,289 firm‐year observations across 42 countries from 2002 to 2019 and documents that a higher proportion of women directors enhances climate risk disclosure, particularly women independent directors. Additionally, global gender quota reforms strengthen this relationship, and women directors and climate risk disclosure collectively contribute to improving firm performance. These results hold various robustness tests, including endogeneity assessments. This research contributes to the ongoing discourse on the business case for board gender diversity and provides valuable insights for regulators, investors, and policymakers.
Gull et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: