As technology advancements escalate and AI and other technological applications grow, the need for strong cybersecurity has become critical, especially as cyber threats become increasingly sophisticated. The cost of cyberattacks has become significant, with companies facing billions in losses and compromising sensitive data, as evidenced by high-profile breaches like the recent Microsoft-Crowdstrike incident, which impacted critical infrastructure worldwide. Despite the deployment of multi-factor authentication and training initiatives, a significant vulnerability persists within businesses: employees. Human errors, particularly in response to phishing and spam, are primary vectors for data breaches, underscoring the need for proactive security measures. This research proposes an AI-driven system that proactively identifies employees exhibiting high-risk behavior patterns, thereby enabling targeted, proactive interventions. By analyzing data on factors such as frequency of spam interactions, behavioral indicators, experience, and training attendance, the AI application can assess and flag employees who may inadvertently compromise security. An application installed on company devices gathers and evaluates real-time data, which is then reviewed to take preventative action. This approach emphasizes early detection and mitigation of human-related cyber risks, ultimately safeguarding business continuity and reducing the likelihood of large-scale cyber incidents. Through this system, companies can better understand employee-based vulnerabilities, enabling informed decision-making to enhance critical security in a growing cyber threat world.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Neeraj Bhargava
Scholarly review .
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Neeraj Bhargava (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68bb49db6d6d5674bcd001ed — DOI: https://doi.org/10.70121/001c.143826
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: