BACKGROUND 95% CI: 1.21—1.34) or low workplace social support (RR = 1.18; 95% CI: 1.06—1.32) had a significantly higher risk of developing T2DM compared to those reporting no loneliness or high workplace support. Positive but non-significant associations were observed for social isolation (RR = 1.21; 95% CI: 0.98—1.49), low structural support (RR = 1.10; 95% CI: 0.98—1.23), and low functional support (RR = 1.03; 95% CI: 0.99—1.08). CONCLUSIONS: These findings emphasize the importance of social connections in metabolic health, suggesting that interventions aimed at reducing loneliness and strengthening social and workplace support may play a role in diabetes prevention efforts.
Levis et al. (Tue,) studied this question.