This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of artificial intelligence-powered automated grading systems (AI AGSs) in STEM education, systematically examining their algorithmic foundations, mathematical modeling approaches, and quantitative evaluation methodologies. AI AGSs enhance grading efficiency by providing large-scale, instant feedback and reducing educators’ workloads. Compared to traditional manual grading, these systems improve consistency and scalability, supporting a wide range of assessment types, from programming assignments to open-ended responses. This paper provides a structured taxonomy of AI techniques including logistic regression, decision trees, support vector machines, convolutional neural networks, transformers, and generative models, analyzing their mathematical formulations and performance characteristics. It further examines critical challenges, such as user trust issues, potential biases, and students’ over-reliance on automated feedback, alongside quantitative evaluation using precision, recall, F1-score, and Cohen’s Kappa metrics. The analysis includes feature engineering strategies for diverse educational data types and prompt engineering methodologies for large language models. Lastly, we highlight emerging trends, including explainable AI and multimodal assessment systems, offering educators and researchers a mathematical foundation for understanding and implementing AI AGSs into educational practices.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
L Tan
Nanyang Technological University
Shiyu Hu
Wenzhou Medical University
Darren J. Yeo
Ministry of Education
Mathematics
Nanyang Technological University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Tan et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68c182529b7b07f3a060ec71 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/math13172828
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: