In order to enhance the performance of 112 Gb/s polarization-multiplexed quadrature phase-shift keying (PM-QPSK) coherent optical receivers, a novel digital signal processing (DSP) framework is presented in this study. The suggested method combines cutting-edge signal processing techniques to address important constraints in long-distance, high data rate coherent systems. The framework uses overlap frequency domain equalization (OFDE) for chromatic dispersion (CD) compensation, which offers a cheaper computational cost and higher dispersion control precision than traditional time-domain equalization. An adaptive carrier phase recovery (CPR) technique based on mean-squared differential phase (MSDP) estimation is incorporated to manage phase noise induced by cross-phase modulation (XPM), providing dependable correction under a variety of operating situations. When combined, these techniques significantly increase Q factor performance, and optimum systems can handle transmission distances of up to 2400 km. The suggested DSP approach improves phase stability and dispersion tolerance even in the presence of nonlinear impairments, making it a viable and effective choice for contemporary coherent optical networks. The framework’s competitiveness was evaluated by comparing it against the most recent, cutting-edge DSP methods that were released after 2021. These included CPR systems that were based on kernels, transformers, and machine learning. The findings show that although AI-driven approaches had the highest absolute Q factors, they also required a large amount of computing power. On the other hand, the suggested OFDE in conjunction with adaptive CPR achieved Q factors of up to 11.7 dB over extended distances with a significantly reduced DSP effort, striking a good balance between performance and complexity. Its appropriateness for scalable, long-haul 112 Gb/s PM-QPSK systems is confirmed by a complexity versus performance trade-off analysis, providing a workable and efficient substitute for more resource-intensive alternatives.
Barakat et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: