Abstract Purpose To prospectively evaluate patient and clinician reported outcomes of sexual function and health-related quality of life (QOL) of transgender women preoperatively (t0), 6 months (t1), and 12 months (t2) after gender-affirming surgery (GAS) with penile inversion vaginoplasty. Methods Transgender women undergoing two-stage GAS at our tertiary care center were included (04/2019–01/2023). Patients received a composed questionnaire including a validated questionnaire (SF-12). Clinical outcomes and adverse events were evaluated. A regression analysis was performed to identify possible risk factors for a deterioration in sexual function and QOL. Results Fifty-three patients with an average age of 40.27 ± 14.43 years were included. Complications were mostly minor (Clavien Dindo Classification grade I/II). The depth of the neovagina postoperatively was 11.98 ± 2.19 cm and the width 3.44 ± 0.98 cm. 79.4% of patients were able to experience an orgasm 12 months postoperatively. Orgasm quality increased significantly over the measurement time points ( p = 0.003). The SF-12 average physical and mental scores of our collective were similar to the German populations average scores with no significant differences between the time measurement points ( p = 0.405 and p = 0.198, respectively). The mental score was always lower than the physical score. A multiple linear regression analysis showed age < 40 years to be a significant influence factor regarding the physical QOL-score ( p = 0.048) and the ability to experience an orgasm ( p = 0.026). Conclusion Penile inversion vaginoplasty is a safe procedure that yields favorable outcomes regarding sexual function and health-related QOL. Younger age significantly predicts improved physical QOL and the ability to experience orgasm postoperatively.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Manuel Wenk
Nathalie Rademacher
B. Liedl
World Journal of Urology
Heidelberg University
University Hospital Heidelberg
University Medical Centre Mannheim
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Wenk et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68c182529b7b07f3a060eda3 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-025-05887-9
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: