As the region with the earliest housing stock market and the most advanced development in China, the Pearl River Delta has experienced extensive housing demolition and construction, leading to buildings having short lifespans. The environmental pollution generated during this process has brought attention to the concept of green buildings. However, whether due to previous patterns of demolition and construction or the significant impacts of social and economic changes in the current and future housing stock contexts, the comprehensive adaptability of human-centered living spaces remains a crucial issue. This focus is strongly related to the residents’ psychological responses, such as sense of belonging, safety, and atmosphere, across different scales of physical environment. However, most housing evaluation systems regarding sustainable issues are green building evaluation systems. And their concept and practice are often accompanied by a neglect of the interrelationship between people and the built environment, as well as a lack of an appropriate methodological framework to integrate these elements in the temporal dimension. This paper primarily tries to provide new answers to old questions about housing durability by reconceptualizing evaluation systems beyond ecological metrics, while simultaneously challenging accepted answers that privilege material and energy indicators over sociocultural embeddedness. Moreover, an effective housing evaluation framework must transcend purely technical or ecological indicators to systematically integrate the temporal and sociocultural factors that sustain long-term residential quality, particularly in rapidly transforming urban contexts. Therefore, theories closely related to building longevity, such as open building and the “level” strategy, were introduced. Based on this combined methodological framework, selected cases of local traditional housing and green building evaluation systems were studied, aiming to identify valuable longevity factors and improved evaluation methods. Furthermore, two rounds of expert consultation and a data analysis were conducted. The first round helped determine the local indexes and preliminary evaluation methods, while the second round helped confirm the weighting value of each index through a questionnaire study and data analysis. This systematic study ultimately established a preliminary long-term housing evaluation system for the Pearl River Delta.
Qīng Wáng (Tue,) studied this question.