Predictive policing has become one of the most contentious uses of technology in law enforcement and forensic science. Predictive policing, grounded in data-driven approaches, aims to anticipate criminal activities utilizing algorithms, artificial intelligence (AI), and big data analytics. Proponents assert that these systems improve efficiency and resource allocation in law enforcement, while critics highlight issues of systematic bias, privacy violations, and the diminishment of civil freedoms. In forensic science, predictive policing signifies a transformative change in the interpretation of evidence, the profiling of suspects, and the administration of justice. This paper offers a thorough analysis of predictive policing, including its historical development, technological foundations, practical implementations, and, crucially, the ethical challenges it poses within forensic sciences. This paper critically assesses the relationship between algorithmic decision-making and forensic practice, evaluating the advantages and disadvantages of predictive policing while providing policy recommendations to reconcile security with justice, fairness, and accountability.
S.C. Saxena (Tue,) studied this question.