Background Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) has become a standard treatment to re-invigorate tumor-attacking T cell responses in multiple cancer indications, yet a patient’s response is unpredictable even with a confirmed expression of the relevant targets such as PD-1 or PD-L1. Previously identified biomarkers of response have relatively low accuracy, making it difficult to reliably employ them as predictors of clinical response. Methods We comprehensively phenotyped peripheral blood CD8+ T cells from patients with non-small cell lung cancer by analyzing surface marker expression, transcriptome, and TCR repertoire with single-cell sequencing technology. The cohorts were comprised of patients who (a) responded to anti-PD(L)1 treatment for a prolonged period of time (b) were new-on-treatment responders, and (c) were new-on-treatment nonresponders. Using various bioinformatics analyses, we defined the signatures of ICI response and evaluated their performance on external scRNA-seq datasets. Results We identified response-specific signals in cell type and cell state proportions as well as in TCR repertoire diversity and TCR inter-donor similarity. The enrichment analysis revealed several pathways and regulatory modules enriched in different response groups. Using machine learning, we identified cell-type-specific signatures that predicted the ICI response with an accuracy between 66% and 93% at the single cell level and up to 94% at the patient level. Effector memory CD8+ T cells in long-term responders were most predictive of response, and the inferred effector memory signature could be successfully applied to two related scRNA-seq datasets. CD44, GIMAP4, CD69, and CCL4L2 were among the most relevant contributing markers defining the predictive ML signatures on lung cancer samples. Conclusion Our findings suggest that CD8+ T cell subset-specific models reach an accuracy that possesses the potential to inform treatment decisions in a clinical setting.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Florian Schmidt
Kan Xing Wu
Yovita Ida Purwanti
Frontiers in Oncology
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Schmidt et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68c1956b9b7b07f3a06198e8 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2025.1629802
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: