What type of study is this?

This is a Cohort Study study (also classified as: Quantitative Study).

September 12, 2025Open Access

Differentiating clinically important interstitial lung abnormalities in lung cancer screening

BSBrintha SelvarajahLiving Streets ABAmyn BhamaniLiving Streets MAMehran AzimbagiradUniversidade de Ribeirão Preto

Key Points

New visual classification system improved interobserver agreement for interstitial lung abnormalities in lung cancer screening.
Mortality rates were significantly higher in undiagnosed interstitial lung disease subjects compared to matched controls, emphasizing clinical implications.
The presence of interstitial lung abnormalities showed strong independent associations with mortality, beyond traditional lung function metrics.
Increased comorbidities prior to diagnosis suggest a need for early comprehensive evaluations in lung cancer screening populations.

Abstract

Interstitial lung abnormalities (ILAs) are common incidental findings in lung cancer screening (LCS). However, challenges remain in identifying clinically relevant ILAs as highlighted in a joint statement by a European multidisciplinary task force led by the European Respiratory Society (ERS). To address these challenges, we analysed ILAs identified in one of Europe's largest LCS studies. Of 11 635 LCS individuals, 417 screen-detected ILAs were evaluated using a new visual classification system focused on traction bronchiolectasis: non-fibrotic ILA (no traction bronchiolectasis), fibrotic ILA (traction bronchiolectasis in ≤2 lobes); undiagnosed interstitial lung disease (traction bronchiolectasis in >2 lobes). Observer agreement was compared with Fleischner Society ILA classification using Cohen's Kappa. An age, sex and smoking history-matched control group allowed the examination of associations between baseline ILA/UILD and comorbidities, forced vital capacity (FVC), hospitalisations (Student's t-tests) and mortality (univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models). Our visual ILA classification showed superior interobserver agreement (K=0.76) versus the Fleischner ILA classification (K=0.64). ILA/UILD subjects had more prevalent comorbidities, increasing (vs controls) approximately 10 years prior to ILA/UILD diagnosis. Compared with controls, mortality rates were 6-fold higher for UILD participants and 3-fold higher for fibrotic and non-fibrotic ILA subtypes. On multivariable Cox regression analysis, ILA/UILD presence (HR=4.90, 95% CI =2.36 to 10.10, p<0.001) showed stronger independent associations with mortality than baseline FVC (HR=0.98, 95% CI =0.96 to 1.00, p=0.04). We demonstrate a new reproducible classification of clinically important ILA/UILDs in LCS populations. We highlight that FVC shows limited associations with mortality in ILA/UILD subjects. Increased multiorgan comorbidity in ILA/UILD subjects highlights a need for comprehensive early multisystem evaluation.

Ask AI

Helpful

Bookmark

View Full Paper