This essay examines the National Basketball Association (NBA) as a case study to critique the consequences of neoliberal policies and the lack of government regulation in professional sports. Focusing on the NBA’s monopolistic practices, the analysis highlights how deregulation has fostered anti-competitive behaviour, limited free speech, and impaired ethical business conduct. The essay explores two primary issues: (1) the NBA’s prioritization of financial interests over democratic values, exemplified by its equivocal responses to controversies involving China and Turkey, which suppressed player activism; and (2) systemic exploitation of athletes through the NCAA, hypocritical financial practices, and restrictive league expansion policies that harm public and worker interests. The author argues that the NBA’s unchecked monopoly, enabled by weak antitrust enforcement, undermines neoliberal ideals of competition and efficiency, necessitating state intervention. Recommendations include establishing a federal regulatory agency to oversee foreign investments, mitigate geopolitical risks, and ensure alignment with public interests. By addressing these gaps, the essay advocates for rebalancing market autonomy and state oversight to uphold ethical standards and protect stakeholder rights in professional sports.
Yashraj Chavda (Tue,) studied this question.