Selective attention is widely thought to be sensitive to visual objects. This is commonly observed in cueing studies, which show that when attention is deployed to a known target location that happens to fall on a visual object, responses to targets that unexpectedly appear at other locations on that object are faster and more accurate, as if the object in its entirety has been visually prioritized. However, this notion has recently been challenged by results suggesting that putative object-based effects may reflect the influence of hemifield anisotropies in attentional deployment, or of unacknowledged influences of perceptual complexity and visual clutter. Studies employing measures of behavior provide limited opportunity to address these challenges. Here, we used EEG to directly measure the influence of task-irrelevant objects on the deployment of visual attention. We had participants complete a simple visual cueing task involving identification of a target that appeared at either a cued location or elsewhere. Throughout each experimental trial, displays contained task-irrelevant rectangle stimuli that could be oriented horizontally or vertically. We derived two cue-elicited indices of attentional deployment-lateralized alpha oscillations and the ADAN component of the event-related potential-and found that these were sensitive to the otherwise irrelevant orientation of the rectangles. Our results provide evidence that the allocation of visual attention is influenced by objects boundaries, supporting models of object-based attentional prioritization.
Grignolio et al. (Mon,) studied this question.