Purpose The purpose of this paper is to identify the role of education for literacy and socially-important behaviour using a financial investment context. Design/methodology/approach A survey-based experiment involving 1,202 Australian adults compared four educational formats – text, imagery, audio and video – on their ability to improve financial literacy and influence investment choices. Participants completed a pre- and post-quiz, a behaviourally relevant investment task and attitudinal evaluations. Findings The four educational formats all improved financial literacy, with video-based education producing the most substantial gains. However, effectiveness depended on risk tolerance: video was most effective for risk-averse individuals but less so for risk-takers. Educational format had limited influence on investment behaviour, with demographic factors such as age, literacy level and risk profile playing a greater role. Practical implications Financial institutions should prioritise video-based education while integrating interactive, real-time learning tools to support financial decision-making, recognising that financial education in isolation does not alter investment behaviours. Originality/value This study contributes to the debate on financial education’s impact, demonstrating format-dependent learning effects while emphasising that education alone is insufficient to drive financial behaviour change. The findings support the case for just-in-time financial education, where learning is embedded within real-world financial decisions.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Merle Marie Luise Henrica van den Akker
University of Technology Sydney
Reserve Bank of Australia
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Merle Marie Luise Henrica van den Akker (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68d4538731b076d99fa58b73 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/jsibr-11-2024-0057
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: