OBJECTIVE: To evaluate exercise reporting completeness at the exercise level using the Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template (CERT) checklist (a guideline for reporting of exercise trials, consisting of 19 items), explore the partial credit versus traditional full credit model of scoring completeness, and assess the reliability of scoring methods. DESIGN: Methodological review of randomized clinical trials LITERATURE SEARCH: Eight databases were searched for trials investigating exercise for subacromial pain syndrome (SAPS), published between January 2021 and February 2024. STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA: Trials examining exercise in treatment and comparator arms for SAPS were included. Of 25 eligible studies, 10 were randomly selected for analysis. DATA SYNTHESIS: Each exercise was scored with a modified CERT, using a partial credit model. Exercise-level mean scores were calculated for each study and compared to traditional study-level scores. Proportions of completeness and interrater reliability were calculated for each CERT item. RESULTS: The mean CERT total score of 7.3/20 using a partial credit model (0, 0.5, or 1 point) across all exercises demonstrates inadequate exercise reporting, with lower scores indicating incomplete reporting. Traditional scoring (0 or 1 point) applied at the exercise level (using recoding) resulted in a judgment of less complete reporting, with a mean CERT score of 3.7/20, while traditional study-level scoring suggested more complete reporting (M = 8.7). Reliability (kappa) was improved with partial credit (mean k = 0.54) versus traditional study-level scoring (mean k = 0.29). CONCLUSION: Exercise-level CERT scoring with a partial credit model details gaps in reporting and limitations of the traditional study-level scoring. This somewhat labor-intensive approach provides a more accurate and reliable assessment of exercise reporting completeness.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Joshua A. Subialka
Midwestern University
Ryan C. McConnell
Benchmark Research (United States)
Ethan Vosburgh
VR Rehab (United States)
Wayne State University
Western Kentucky University
Midwestern University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Subialka et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68d453a431b076d99fa59ac3 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.2519/josptmethods.2025.0004