Blue carbon ecosystems — mangroves, seagrasses, and salt marshes — play a critical role in climate change mitigation by sequestering and storing carbon. Blue carbon credit score markets’ development allows for restoration and conservation with the promise of economic incentive, but the prison and regulatory systems governing them are still fragmented and dynamic. This article discusses the legal challenges, opportunities, and governance arrangements that influence blue carbon credit score markets, particularly within the framework of climate version, resilience, and the digital financial system. Critical issues include the standardization of carbon size methods, the role of global agreements such as the Paris Agreement and Article 6 carbon buying and selling frameworks, and the integration of blockchain and AI-driven verification frameworks for increased transparency and fraud avoidance. Furthermore, jurisdictional disputes exist in carbon right definition, especially in coastal regions where land ownership and marine administration interact. The article discusses national and local policies that could be leading to blue carbon credit schemes, highlighting legal precedents and fiscal mechanisms selling equal advantage-sharing to local communities. In addition, they look at examines digital finance innovations, including tokenized blue carbon credit and decentralized verification frameworks, in enhancing regulatory compliance. Solidifying legal foundations and embracing generation-driven regulatory solutions can be critical in ensuring the legitimacy, scalability, and long-term effectiveness of blue carbon markets as a climate resilience strategy.
Kolawole Afuwape (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: