Climate justice has become one of the central issues occupying a prominent position on the international agenda, particularly in the context of addressing the escalating challenges of climate change. The concept of climate justice seeks to establish a fair balance between two interrelated paths: the first involves the urgent need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions responsible for global warming, while the second emphasizes the importance of re-evaluating traditional systems related to the extraction, distribution, and transportation of natural resources, as well as the production of goods, energy generation, service provision, patterns of consumption, waste disposal, and climate finance mechanisms. Environmental justice represents a critical intersection between human rights and climate change concerns. Its primary objective is to safeguard the rights of individuals who may be adversely affected by the negative impacts of climate change. In this sense, environmental justice serves as the most effective approach to ensuring the equitable distribution of climate-related burdens and costs between industrialized, developed countries on one hand, and developing nations on the other, taking into account historical responsibilities for emissions and the differing capacities for adaptation and response. The significance of this study lies in the absence of a clear international consensus on how to implement the principle of equitable and fair distribution of the benefits and burdens arising from climate change. Accordingly, there is a pressing need to explore the position of international law with regard to environmental justice, as it constitutes a fundamental entry point for understanding the legal and regulatory frameworks governing this complex issue.
Douha Khamis Mohammed Abed Al-Dulaimi (Mon,) studied this question.