Motivation: DTI acquires multiple diffusional directional images with repetition, containing large redundancy within the dataset. Denoising this dataset may improve image quality and reduce scan times. However, its effectiveness at different processing stages has not been investigated yet. Goal(s): This study aimed to compare the performance of denoising networks applied at different stages of DTI processing. Approach: Networks were trained for three stages: DWIs, diffusion tensor maps, and parameter maps. Their performance was compared using voxel-wise and ROI-wise analysis in a cuprizone mouse model. Results: Denoising diffusion parameter maps showed the best overall performance, preserving image quality while maintaining the integrity of group-level analyses. Impact: This study compares deep learning-powered denoising methods across different DTI processing stages, evaluating their effects on DTI analysis. Our findings suggest that denoising diffusion parameter maps offers the best outcomes.
Hong et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: