Both positive psychology and pro-environmental behavior are highly associated with individuals’ well-being. While previous studies have investigated the drivers of sustainable behavior, very few pieces have examined the influence of perceived social support on pro-environmental behavior. Drawing on social exchange theory, the study aims to explore the relationship between perceived social support and pro-environmental behavior. The current study recruited 605 participants, and empirically examined the relationship between perceived social support and individuals’ pro-environmental behavior, and underlying mechanism utilizing hierarchical regression and bootstrapping method. The regression coefficient of perceived social support and pro-environmental behavior is 0.511 (SE = 0.034, p < 0.001). The indirect effects of empathy and gratitude are 0.259 (SE = 0.040) and 0.185 (SE = 0.044), with 95% confidential interval 0.182, 0.339 and 0.099, 0.272, respectively. Perceived social support is positively related to individuals’ pro-environmental behavior, indicating that individuals who perceive a higher level of social support are more inclined to engage in pro-environmental behavior compared to those who perceive a lower level of social support. Additionally, the relationship between perceived social support and pro-environmental behavior is parallel mediated by individuals’ empathy and gratitude, with empathy playing a more significant role than gratitude. This implies that individuals who experience a greater sense of social support tend to exhibit higher degrees of empathy and gratitude, which in turn helps amplify their engagement in pro-environmental behavior.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Xiaotong Jin
Qilu University of Technology
Yong Zhu
Tianjin University
Xiao Yang
Jilin University
SAGE Open
Jilin University
Chuxiong Normal University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Jin et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68d45e4e31b076d99fa5e661 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251362283