Background Child and adolescent mental health is a public health priority, and prevention, early intervention, and treatment are identified as national strategic priorities. Children and young people (CYP) in the United Kingdom are experiencing poorer mental health outcomes than ever, and the demand for services is the highest on record. Understanding the effectiveness of school-based interventions for promoting and developing emotional well-being is a core research priority. A school-based intervention that is inclusive and has the potential for widespread delivery is ‘Forest School’. Forest schools provide children with immersive experiences in nature that are non-classroom-based and have a core focus on child-led activities and exploration. Despite widespread implementation, evidence about optimal delivery methods for Forest Schools and their impact on mental health and emotional well-being is scarce. This study will generate new knowledge about the feasibility of running a definitive Forest School trial with Key Stage 2 (KS2) children aged between 7–11 inclusive of children with special educational needs and disabilities. Research Questions Is Forest School an acceptable and feasible intervention to improve the mental health of KS2 children? Is it feasible to run a cluster Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT) of Forest School for children in key stage 2 (aged 7–11)? Objectives 1. Test feasibility of trial procedures for recruitment, randomisation, and data collection 2. Conduct a mixed methods process evaluation to evaluate implementation and fidelity 3. Collect feasibility data to support an economic evaluation in a full trial 4. Refine the current logic model and optimise the intervention Methods In Work Package (WP) 1, we will conduct a feasibility cluster RCT of a Forest School intervention with 200 children in five schools across Hull, East Yorkshire, and North Yorkshire. We will test the acceptability and feasibility of intervention delivery, assess the feasibility of the trial processes, and establish key parameters for effectiveness. In WP2, we will evaluate the quality and fidelity of intervention delivery through process evaluation, including observations and qualitative interviews. WP3 focused on the preliminary collection of health economic data. WP4 uses focus groups to refine the logic model and optimize the content of the intervention. We seek to produce a manualised toolkit informed by interconnected work packages to inform further research and implementation. The trial was registered in ISRCTN (The United Kingdom’s Trial Registry). Clinical Trials Registration Number ISRCTN87263624. Patient and Public Involvement This proposal was developed with the active involvement of parents/guardians, children, and schools alongside key stakeholders from the local authority, education, and the community sector. Dissemination We will develop accessible presentations, online workshops with interactive elements, and newsletters. Producing a set of easily read infographics and creative outputs (video/social media) alongside our children’s Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) groups will be a key output. We anticipate that two publications in open-access peer-reviewed journals will share the quantitative and qualitative findings of the study.
Armitt et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: