We ask how Lorentzian causal structure can emerge from a pregeometric substrate. For a rigorously defined class of finite–range, ferromagnetically coupled “chronon” models with quartic norm pinning, we prove the existence, with strictly positive Gibbs probability, of a macroscopic percolating domain \ (D M\) on which the coarse–grained field \ (^\) is smooth, future–directed, unit–norm timelike (\ (^_=-1\), \ (⁰0\) ) and twist–free. We work on a smooth differentiable manifold but do not assume Lorentzian signature or a global time field a priori; these arise on \ (D\) from the dynamics. Under four operational axioms—well-posed local dynamics, finite-speed signalling, acyclic causal order, and stable memory/records—we further prove that no alternative (Euclidean or ultrahyperbolic) signature, nor a Lorentzian background lacking a globally unit–norm time field, can sustain such behavior; the Lorentzian, unit–norm phase is therefore exclusive. Finally, we show that “measurement” acts as a boundary-induced selector of this phase: an interface coupling to an aligned apparatus field \ (A\) admits a unique minimizer, pins the norm and alignment, suppresses twist, and drives any initial state to the aligned phase with exponential convergence; large-deviation bounds quantify high-fidelity selection. While our theorems hold for general \ ( (1, d) \) signatures with \ (d 1\), heuristic coarse-graining and stability considerations suggest \ (d=3\) as the most probable large-scale outcome. Together, these results provide a mathematically controlled foundation for the emergence and exclusivity of Lorentzian causal structure and for boundary-driven selection (measurement) in pregeometric ensembles.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Bin Li
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Bin Li (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68d464e031b076d99fa63b4b — DOI: https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202509.1526.v1
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: