Art engagement is increasingly recognized as a supportive intervention in behavioral health settings, with evidence linking art exposure and participation to improvements in emotion regulation, stress reduction, therapeutic engagement, and clinical outcomes. Yet there is limited research on how art engagement is implemented and perceived in behavioral health settings, including across levels – passive, active, and interactive art exposure, and art-making. This study first conducted a literature review in neuroscience, psychology, and environmental design, to identify mechanisms by which art engagement may influence brain function, health and wellbeing, and clinical outcomes. To extend this research, two surveys were conducted across 40 behavioral health institutions in the United States to evaluate staff’s perceptions of art’s impact on themselves and their patients. Respondents reported positive impacts of art interventions on mood, stress, patient engagement in therapy, and staff morale, while also identifying barriers such as funding, leadership support, and arts training. Arts programming was more commonly offered to patients than staff, despite high staff interest, yet institutions offering programming to both groups reported better outcomes across nearly every measured domain. Drawing from the literature and survey data, a framework is proposed for integrating art into behavioral health settings at environmental, programmatic, and organizational levels: the CARE framework – Curated environment, Active programming, Recovery tools, Equitable access. Together, these findings position art engagement as an evidence-informed strategy to enhance patient care and staff wellbeing and highlight the need for standardized approaches to implementation and evaluation.
Whalen et al. (Fri,) studied this question.