Abstract Most discussions of forest policy are focussed on specific proposals, laws, or programs. There is an equal need to turn our attention to the criteria which may be used to decide whether specific policies are good, bad, or indifferent. The following article presents a critical analysis of a few of these criteria. It suggests the need for a more clearcut conception of the goals of forest conservation than foresters have yet developed.
Henry J. Vaux (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: