PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 20, 20252 citations

Consensus-Guided Incomplete Multi-view Clustering via Cross-view Affinities Learning

View Full Paper
QLQian LiuHWHuibing WangJPJinjia Peng

Key Points

  • CAL demonstrates significant improvements in clustering performance over traditional methods, focusing on multi-view scenarios.
  • The method implements a structured sparse constraint to refine representation tensors, reducing bias from noisy data.
  • CAL strategically reconstructs views to capture sample-wise affinities, enhancing data quality and clustering results.
  • Cross-view affinities allow for better semantic correlation understanding, leading to a unified structural graph in multiple views.

Abstract

Incomplete multi-view clustering (IMC) has garnered substantial attention due to its capacity to handle unlabeled data. Existing methods predominantly explore pairwise consistency between every two views. However, such consistency is highly susceptible to missing samples and outliers within a certain view and thus deviates from the true clustering distribution. Moreover, dual-view interaction neglects the collaboration effects of multiple views, making it challenging to capture the holistic characteristics across views. In response to these issues, we propose a novel Consensus-Guided Incomplete Multi-view Clustering via Cross-view Affinities Learning (CAL). Specifically, CAL reconstructs views with available instances to mine sample-wise affinities and harness comprehensive content information within views. Subsequently, to extract clean structural information, CAL imposes a structured sparse constraint on the representation tensor to eliminate biased errors. Furthermore, by integrating the consensus representation into a representation tensor, CAL can employ high-order interaction of multiple views to depict the semantic correlation between views while acquiring a unified structural graph across multiple views. Extensive experiments on seven benchmark datasets demonstrate that CAL outperforms some state-of-the-art methods in clustering performance. The code is available at https://github.com/whbdmu/CAL.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Liu et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d46fcd31b076d99fa69d8dhttps://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2025/641
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Incomplete Contrastive Multi-View Clustering with High-Confidence Guiding2024 · 107 citations
  2. 2Incomplete multiview clustering with multiple contrastive learning and attention mechanism2024
  3. 3Incomplete Multi-View Clustering Via Inference and Evaluation2024 · 6 citations
  4. 4Manifold-based Incomplete Multi-view Clustering via Bi-Consistency Guidance2024
  5. 5High-Confident Local Structure Guided Consensus Graph Learning For Incomplete Multi-view Clustering2025