ABSTRACT Introduction The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide (ITS) identifies key dynamic factors, including thwarted belongingness, perceived burdensomeness, and interpersonal hopelessness, that may aid in assessing and preventing suicidal thoughts and behaviors. These constructs can also be understood within the framework of the Five Factor Model (FFM) of personality. This study aimed to examine the relationship between personality profiles, the severity of suicide‐related histories, and ITS‐related risk factors. Additionally, we sought to determine whether the relationship between ITS‐related risk factors and the severity of suicide‐related histories was moderated by personality profiles. Method A nationwide sample of 1367 adults, collected via CloudResearch, completed an online survey. Results Six distinct personality profiles were identified via latent profile analysis. Elevated levels of neuroticism and low levels of conscientiousness corresponded to the highest levels of suicide‐related histories. Lower levels of neuroticism coupled with higher levels of extraversion and conscientiousness were associated with reduced levels of suicide‐related histories and ITS‐related risk factors. However, personality profiles did not moderate the relationship between ITS‐related risk factors and the severity of suicide‐related histories. Conclusion Future research should investigate whether directly targeting personality domains contributes to mitigating suicide risk and alleviating thwarted belongingness, perceived burdensomeness, and interpersonal hopelessness.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Martina Fruhbauerova
Megan L. Rogers
Julie Cerel
Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior
University of Kentucky
Texas State University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Fruhbauerova et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68d46aa631b076d99fa67428 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/sltb.70048
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: