With the help of digital technologies, tele-rehabilitation has quickly found its application as one of the modalities of physical therapy that enables the provider to offer therapeutic services without personal contact with a patient. In this review, the author considers the advantages and disadvantages of tele-rehabilitation in various clinical practices. Peer-reviewed literature backs its efficiency when it comes to the treatment of musculoskeletal, neurological, pediatric, and geriatric issues, frequently achieving similar results to those provided by conventional in-person treatment. The benefits are enhanced access rate, patient independence, cost reduction, and the possibility of monitoring at any time using wearable devices and mobile apps. Nevertheless, there are some impediments to its rampant execution. These comprise digital disparity, the deficiency of internet access, and diversity in the preparation of the clinicians, inconsistency in reimbursement rules, or cause for concerns about anonymous data and wise consent. Adoption is further perplexed by regulatory complexities, especially cross-jurisdictional practice and licensure. The review also points to other ways forward based on the integration of AI, hybrid care models, standardized measures of outcomes, and policy harmonization at a global level. Tele-rehabilitation could be seen as a viable supplement to conventional physical therapy, with its success depending on the strategic investments in building infrastructure, training, and regulatory patterns.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Priti Nathani
International Journal of Science and Research Archive
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Priti Nathani (Sat,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68d46ac231b076d99fa68248 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/ijsra.2025.16.3.2638