Talquetamab, a GPRC5D-targeting bispecific antibody for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), plus daratumumab may lead to deeper and more durable responses than either therapy alone. In the phase 1b TRIMM-2 study, patients with RRMM (at least 3 prior lines of therapy or double refractory to a proteasome inhibitor and an immunomodulatory drug) received subcutaneous talquetamab 0.4 mg/kg weekly (QW; "QW cohort") or 0.8 mg/kg every other week (Q2W; "Q2W cohort") plus daratumumab 1800 mg per the approved schedule. The primary end point was safety. Secondary end points included overall response and duration of response. Progression-free survival was an exploratory end point. Sixty-five patients (median 5 prior lines of therapy; 61.5% triple-class refractory; 24.6% bispecific antibody-exposed) received talquetamab plus daratumumab (QW, n = 14; Q2W, n = 51; median follow-up: 18.6 months). Most common adverse events were oral events, skin events, cytokine release syndrome, and infections. Grade 3/4 events occurred in 81.5%. Two patients had dose-limiting toxicities, both in the Q2W cohort (grade 3 stomatitis/oral mucositis and grade 3 maculopapular rash). Responses occurred in 71.4% (QW cohort) and 82.4% (Q2W cohort) of patients. Median progression-free survival was 23.3 and 21.2 months, respectively, in each cohort. Pharmacodynamic results suggest the immunomodulatory action of daratumumab contributes to a conducive environment for talquetamab by reducing immunosuppressive cells. Talquetamab plus daratumumab demonstrated promising efficacy outcomes in heavily pretreated patients, with a safety profile consistent with each agent as monotherapy. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04108195
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ajai Chari
Niels W.C.J. van de Donk
Bhagirathbhai Dholaria
Blood
Heidelberg University
University of Calgary
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Chari et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68d4725d31b076d99fa6b61e — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.2025029360
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: