Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) refers to legal mechanisms such as arbitration, mediation, and negotiation that resolve disputes outside of the traditional court system. The main objective of this research is to evaluate the current state of ADR in Bangladesh and propose specific reforms to make ADR more accessible, credible, and effective. This includes advocating for the development of a unified legal framework, the institutionalization of ADR procedures, and the professionalization of mediators and arbitrators. The study also aims to assess whether ADR offers equal justice for all parties—particularly disadvantaged groups—and how public trust and court endorsement can enhance ADR usage in resolving civil and some criminal matters. To achieve these objectives, the study adopts a qualitative research methodology based on doctrinal legal analysis and comparative evaluation. It examines primary sources such as legislation, policy documents, and judicial practices, as well as secondary sources including legal literature, academic commentary, and reports by NGOs and international organizations. Insights are also drawn from ADR models in other South Asian jurisdictions to identify best practices that could be adapted to the Bangladeshi context. The findings suggest that a properly structured and enforced ADR system, supported by trained professionals and public awareness, can reduce the burden on courts and deliver timely and equitable justice.
Hossain et al. (Mon,) studied this question.