ABSTRACT Clinical trials are becoming increasingly complex, incorporating numerous parameters and degrees of freedom. Optimal analytic approaches for these intricate trial designs are often unavailable, necessitating extensive simulation to control the Type I error rate and power, while reducing sample size and achieving favorable operating characteristics. This paper proposes a general method to reduce the dimension of the design space using group stepwise methods and Monte Carlo simulations, significantly decreasing the number of iterations required to identify near‐optimal parameters. The method extends classical Group Sequential Designs but does not rely on normality assumptions and can accommodate complex trial designs. We offer a simulation study comparing the optimality, precision, and efficiency (runtime) of our method to those of existing approaches and conclude that our new method offers an attractive trade‐off among these three key summaries.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Amitay Kamber
University of Cambridge
Elad Berkman
Edna Pasher Ph.D & Associates (Israel)
Tzviel Frostig
Statistics in Medicine
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Kamber et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68d473bb31b076d99fa6cbc1 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.70249
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: