Abstract Philosophers have been drawing their attention to the metaphysics of symmetries. Most have taken a Closed System View, that is, the metaphysical assumption that closed systems are ontologically fundamental. In this paper, I explore the consequences of adopting a different perspective, the Open System View, according to which open systems are regarded as ontologically fundamental. I argue that by doing so, our metaphysical understanding of symmetries changes substantially in three respects: epistemic approaches are favored, ontic approaches should change the set of physical symmetries regarded as fundamental, and the metaphysical connection between conservation principles and symmetries is weaker than thought.
Cristian López (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: