Abstract Background Older adults and females are under-represented in randomized clinical trials, and evidence on age- and sex-related differences in heart failure (HF) characteristics and treatment patterns is limited. Objectives To evaluate age- and sex-related differences in clinical characteristics and treatments of an all-comers cohort of HF patients. Methods The BRING-UP-3 HF study is a prospective, observational, multicenter investigation encompassing 179 Italian cardiology sites. Multivariable logistic regression models were applied to evaluate predictors of HF treatments across sex and age strata. Optimal medical therapy (OMT) was defined as the patient receiving all guideline-recommended medications. Results A total of 5,203 HF patients (median age 72 years; 24% female) were included over three months. Females were older, had a higher prevalence of non-ischemic HF etiologies, and were less likely to receive OMT compared with males. Similarly, older patients also experienced suboptimal treatment. After multivariable adjustment only age remained independently associated with a lower likelihood of receiving OMT (odds ratio per five-year age increase 0.94, 95% confidence interval 0.88-0.93). Conclusions Significant age- and sex-related disparities exist in HF characteristics and treatment patterns. Tailored management strategies are needed to optimize medical therapy for females and older adults, to improve HF outcomes and ensure equitable care. Trial registration number NCT06279988
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Christian Basile
Heart Failure & Transplant
Fabrizio Oliva
Heart Failure & Transplant
Francesco Orso
European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes
Karolinska Institutet
Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico
University of Trieste
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Basile et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68d6e1248b2b6861e4c3f8ed — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcaf113
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: