CRT-D significantly reduced heart failure or death in women with LBBB and QRS 130-149 ms (HR 0.24; 95% CI 0.11-0.53; P<.001), whereas no significant benefit was observed in men.
Meta-Analysis (n=4,076)
Yes
Does CRT-D reduce heart failure events or death compared to ICD in women with LBBB at a shorter QRS duration than men?
Women with LBBB and mild heart failure derive significant clinical benefit from CRT-D at shorter QRS durations (130-149 ms) than men, suggesting sex-specific criteria for CRT-D may be warranted.
Hazard Ratio: 0.24 (95% CI 0.11–0.53)
Absolute Risk Reduction: 23%
p-value: p=<.001
IMPORTANCE: Women were underrepresented in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) trials for heart failure (making up about 20% of enrollees). Combining individual patient data from multiple clinical trials would enable assessment of CRT benefit in women. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether women with left bundle branch block (LBBB) benefit from CRT-defibrillators (CRT-D) at a shorter QRS duration than men with LBBB do. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Individual patient data were pooled from 3 CRT-D vs implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) trials (4076 patients) enrolling predominantly patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II heart failure and follow-up to 3 years. The effect of CRT-D compared with ICD on outcomes was assessed using random effects Cox proportional hazards. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Time to heart failure event or death (primary) and death alone (secondary). RESULTS: Women benefited from CRT-D more than men. The main difference occurred in patients with LBBB and a QRS of 130 to 149 milliseconds. In this group, women had a 76% reduction in heart failure or death (absolute CRT-D to ICD difference, 23%; hazard ratio HR, 0.24, 95% CI, 0.11-0.53; P < .001) and a 76% reduction in death alone (absolute difference 9%; HR, 0.24, 95% CI, 0.06-0.89; P = .03), while there was no significant benefit in men for heart failure or death (absolute difference 4%; HR, 0.85 95% CI, 0.60-1.21; P = .38) or death alone (absolute difference 2%; HR, 0.86 95% CI, 0.49-1.52; P = .60). Neither women nor men with LBBB benefited from CRT-D at QRS shorter than 130 milliseconds, while both sexes with LBBB benefited at QRS of 150 milliseconds or longer. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this population of patients with primarily mild heart failure, women with LBBB benefited from CRT-D at a shorter QRS duration than men with LBBB. This is important because recent guidelines limit the class I indication for CRT-D to patients with LBBB and QRS of 150 milliseconds or longer. While guidelines do give a class IIa indication to patients with LBBB and a QRS of 120 to 149 milliseconds, the present findings are important to communicate because women are less likely to receive CRT-D than men are. This study exemplifies the potential public health and regulatory science value of combining data from multiple clinical trials submitted to the FDA.
Zusterzeel et al. (Mon,) conducted a meta-analysis in Heart failure (n=4,076). CRT-D vs. ICD was evaluated on Time to heart failure event or death (HR 0.24, 95% CI 0.11-0.53, p=<.001). CRT-D significantly reduced heart failure or death in women with LBBB and QRS 130-149 ms (HR 0.24; 95% CI 0.11-0.53; P<.001), whereas no significant benefit was observed in men.