PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 23, 2014JAMA Internal Medicine212 citations

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Women

View Full Paper
RZRobbert ZusterzeelKSKimberly A. SelzmanWSWilliam E. Sanders

Key Result

CRT-D significantly reduced heart failure or death in women with LBBB and QRS 130-149 ms (HR 0.24; 95% CI 0.11-0.53; P<.001), whereas no significant benefit was observed in men.

Study Design

Type

Meta-Analysis (n=4,076)

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

Does CRT-D reduce heart failure events or death compared to ICD in women with LBBB at a shorter QRS duration than men?

P
Population
4,076 patients with predominantly NYHA class II heart failure pooled from 3 trials comparing CRT-D versus ICD, followed for up to 3 years.
I
Intervention
Cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillators (CRT-D)
C
Comparator
Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD)
O
Outcome
Time to heart failure event or deathcomposite

Women with LBBB and mild heart failure derive significant clinical benefit from CRT-D at shorter QRS durations (130-149 ms) than men, suggesting sex-specific criteria for CRT-D may be warranted.

Main Result

Hazard Ratio: 0.24 (95% CI 0.11–0.53)

Absolute Risk Reduction: 23%

p-value: p=<.001

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Women were underrepresented in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) trials for heart failure (making up about 20% of enrollees). Combining individual patient data from multiple clinical trials would enable assessment of CRT benefit in women. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether women with left bundle branch block (LBBB) benefit from CRT-defibrillators (CRT-D) at a shorter QRS duration than men with LBBB do. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Individual patient data were pooled from 3 CRT-D vs implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) trials (4076 patients) enrolling predominantly patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II heart failure and follow-up to 3 years. The effect of CRT-D compared with ICD on outcomes was assessed using random effects Cox proportional hazards. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Time to heart failure event or death (primary) and death alone (secondary). RESULTS: Women benefited from CRT-D more than men. The main difference occurred in patients with LBBB and a QRS of 130 to 149 milliseconds. In this group, women had a 76% reduction in heart failure or death (absolute CRT-D to ICD difference, 23%; hazard ratio HR, 0.24, 95% CI, 0.11-0.53; P < .001) and a 76% reduction in death alone (absolute difference 9%; HR, 0.24, 95% CI, 0.06-0.89; P = .03), while there was no significant benefit in men for heart failure or death (absolute difference 4%; HR, 0.85 95% CI, 0.60-1.21; P = .38) or death alone (absolute difference 2%; HR, 0.86 95% CI, 0.49-1.52; P = .60). Neither women nor men with LBBB benefited from CRT-D at QRS shorter than 130 milliseconds, while both sexes with LBBB benefited at QRS of 150 milliseconds or longer. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this population of patients with primarily mild heart failure, women with LBBB benefited from CRT-D at a shorter QRS duration than men with LBBB. This is important because recent guidelines limit the class I indication for CRT-D to patients with LBBB and QRS of 150 milliseconds or longer. While guidelines do give a class IIa indication to patients with LBBB and a QRS of 120 to 149 milliseconds, the present findings are important to communicate because women are less likely to receive CRT-D than men are. This study exemplifies the potential public health and regulatory science value of combining data from multiple clinical trials submitted to the FDA.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zusterzeel et al. (2014) conducted a meta-analysis in Heart failure (n=4,076). CRT-D vs. ICD was evaluated on Time to heart failure event or death (HR 0.24, 95% CI 0.11-0.53, p=<.001). CRT-D significantly reduced heart failure or death in women with LBBB and QRS 130-149 ms (HR 0.24; 95% CI 0.11-0.53; P<.001), whereas no significant benefit was observed in men.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a4ee59a48f2469dcb184161https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.2717
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Cardiac-Resynchronization Therapy with or without an Implantable Defibrillator in Advanced Chronic Heart Failure2004 · 5,847 citations
  2. 2Effect of QRS Duration and Morphology on Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Outcomes in Mild Heart Failure2012 · 315 citations
  3. 3Effectiveness of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy by QRS Morphology in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial–Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (MADIT-CRT)2011 · 841 citations
  4. 4Electrocardiographic Criteria of True Left Bundle Branch Block: A Simple Sign to Predict a Better Clinical and Instrumental Response to CRT2012 · 101 citations
  5. 5Cardiac-Resynchronization Therapy for Mild-to-Moderate Heart Failure2010 · 1,870 citations