Abstract Reconstruction of external photon doses is essential for credible radiation epidemiology. This article presents the methodology used to derive dose estimates for 37,012 Hanford site workers included in the Million Person Study (MPS). The approach employs historical dosimetry records from the Hanford Radiation Exposure (REX) database and a previous epidemiology study. Bias correction factors specific to dosimeter type and period of use were applied, and missing annual doses were estimated using a hierarchical nearby method. For early years with limited detection sensitivity, missed doses were quantified based on expected time period-specific low-dose distributions. The revised dose estimates resulted in lower median and mean career doses than unadjusted data, while increasing the number of person-years with nonzero dose. Sensitivity analyses assessed the influence of bias in dosimetry measurements, missed doses and gap years on dose estimates. Differences in cumulative dose estimates between unadjusted and revised annual estimates are most prominent in the early operational years due to the highest bias during that time period.
Bellamy et al. (Tue,) studied this question.