Organizational silence is a deliberate phenomenon in which employees withhold their opinions, criticisms, suggestions and as a result undermines effectiveness, innovation, and the quality of decision-making within organizations. The aim of this study was to collect, analyze, and synthesize findings from prior research on this phenomenon and to address the question: “How is organizational silence explained in the workplace?” This research employed a literature review (library-based) with a descriptive–analytical approach. Data were collected from over 40 scholarly articles and case studies published between 2000 and 2024, retrieved from reputable academic databases such as Google Scholar, Scopus, PubMed, JSTOR, ScienceDirect, Emerald Insight and Semantic Scholar. Using qualitative method analysis, key concepts, patterns and influencing factors were identified and organized through open and axial coding and thematic categorization. Findings revealed that organizational silence results from the interaction of four clusters of factors: controlling leadership styles and lack of psychological support, fear of negative consequences and low self-efficacy, rigid hierarchical structures and absence of feedback mechanisms and concerns about social isolation and conservative norms. Alongside high-power distance and organizational distrust, these factors lead to reduced innovation, weakened decision-making quality, increased job stress, and greater turnover intentions. Finally, based on an integrated conceptual framework practical strategies are proposed including promoting empowering and participative leadership, establishing safe communication channels and fostering a culture of continuous feedback to reduce organizational silence and enhance active employee participation. Key Words: Organizational silence, Passive employee engagement, Workplace inactivity, Employee participation, Workplace environments
Mohammad Rasool Manawi (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: