Organizational transformation is becoming a crucial aspect of companies in the present unstable economic climate. However,a lot of change initiatives fail to meet their objectives, frequently as a result of employee resistance. Conventional theoreticalapproaches to change frequently concentrate on structural change and consideration of psychological processes that affectemployees' perceptions and reactions. The main objective of the study is to clarify the psychological foundations of resistanceto change by investigating the relationships between personality traits, emotional reactions, and leadership trust. The studyalso aimed to offer a comprehensive framework for reducing resistance through psychologically informed management. Thestudy employed a mixed-methods approach to achieve these goals. The Big Five personality characteristics and standardizedmeasures of resistance to change were used to gather quantitative data from 250 workers across a range of sectors for the study.Utilizing SEM, the connection between the variables was assessed. Thematic analysis was used to give qualitative depth andtriangulation, and 20 semi-structured interviews were conducted concurrently. According to analytical findings, emotionalresistance was strongly predicted by neuroticism, although total resistance levels were inversely correlated with openness toexperience. One of the key mediating factors was leadership trust. Five major themes emerged from the thematic analysis:leadership credibility, communication breakdown, perceived loss of control, fear of uncertainty, and past change trauma. Thestudy demonstrates that psychological and emotional factors, rather than procedural ones, are the main causes of the resistance.To manage resistance, individualized interventions are needed to improve communication techniques, foster emotional safety,and increase trust. Based on this, the study will propose a human-based model as a foundation for the adoption of sustainablechange.
Pandey et al. (Fri,) studied this question.