AbstractThis essay explores the fundamental inadequacy of language in expressing and mediating human emotion, arguing that its limits are often affective rather than purely logical. Drawing on Ludwig Wittgenstein's philosophy of language, Silvan Tomkins' affect psychology, and recent neuroscience concerning the habenula, the piece demonstrates how language, as a later evolutionary tool, is "pasted on" an ancient, pre-linguistic affective system primarily designed for survival. Concrete examples, such as intimate relationship conflicts, illustrate how words often fail to capture the "braided" nature of emotions, leading to misunderstanding and defense mechanisms. The essay further posits that this affective-linguistic mismatch is exacerbated in contemporary society by the fragmentation of shared multiple inputs, leading to a dangerous divergence of meaning in symbols and discourse. Ultimately, by understanding that affect is primary and that our bodies "feel" before we "speak," the essay advocates for a shift towards greater awareness of our internal states—informed by what music and poetry have always intuitively expressed about affective truth—to foster more gentle, deliberate, and effective communication, moving beyond the illusion of linguistic clarity.
Brian Lynch (Sun,) studied this question.