Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable progress in code generation, but many existing benchmarks are approaching saturation and offer little guarantee on the trustworthiness of the generated programs, offering limited insight into deeper reasoning capabilities. We introduce VerifyThisBench, a new benchmark designed to evaluate LLMs on end-to-end program verification tasks that require interpreting natural language problem descriptions, formulating formal specifications, generating code, and constructing correctness proofs. Our evaluation reveals that even state-of-the-art (SOTA) models, such as o3-mini, achieve a pass rate of less than 4%, with many outputs failing to compile. To reduce task complexity, we further propose VerifyThisBenchXS, a variant in which partial implementations or proofs are provided. We systematically assess SOTA models on both benchmarks, uncovering key strengths and limitations in their formal reasoning and verification capabilities.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Xun Deng
Sicheng Zhong
Andreas Veneris
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Deng et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68da58e0c1728099cfd118a8 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2505.19271
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: