Rapid urbanization threatens water ecosystem services (WESs) in China’s Greater Bay Area. This study employs a Markov-FLUS land-use simulation coupled with the InVEST model to project land-use patterns for 2035 under four scenarios—Natural Development (ND), Farmland Protection (FP), Economic Priority (EP), and Ecological Protection (EcoP)—and evaluates their impacts on water yield, soil retention, and total phosphorus (TP) export. Under ND and FP scenarios, modest gains in water yield (+32.25% and +32.13%) and soil retention (+46.16% and +45.91%) are achieved, but TP control remains limited (−0.05% and +4.82%). In contrast, the EP scenario drives severe declines in water yield (−13.39%) and soil retention (−2.11%) alongside a TP surge (+5.87%), evidencing ecological degradation under high-intensity development. Conversely, the EcoP scenario yields substantial improvements, water yield +50.67%, soil retention +70.94%, and TP export −8.17%, reflecting the synergistic “multiplier effect” of combined woodland and water-body restoration. Spatially, urban cores and agricultural margins exhibit divergent service responses, underscoring the need for differentiated management. We developed a spatial priority map by integrating the predicted WES changes under the Ecological Protection scenario with indicators of urban proximity and pollution risk. This map identifies critical intervention zones. We propose targeted spatial optimization—strict protection of sensitive ecological zones, green transformation in urban expansion areas, and diffuse pollution controls in agricultural peripheries—to reconcile development with ecosystem resilience.
Han et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: