This study investigates the predictive power of current, short-, and long-term expected valence in decision-making within an experience-based learning task. Across two experiments participants engaged in a gambling task where they had to balance short- and long-term outcomes to maximize gains. In Experiment 1 participants had to accept short-term losses to achieve long-term gains, while in Experiment 2 they had to omit short-term gains. Results from generalized mixed-effects models revealed that all three valence constructs (current, short-term, and long-term expected valence) were significant predictors of risky choices, with their influence modulated by the specific choice context. In a loss context participants relied more on short-term expectations, while in an omission context long-term expectations played a stronger role. These findings align with existing literature on the influence of emotional valence on decision-making and demonstrate the adaptability of the subjective valuation system across different choice scenarios. The study highlights the importance of considering multiple emotional self-report dimensions in decision-making processes.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Daniel Thomas Jäger
Jascha Rüsseler
Frontiers in Psychology
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Jäger et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68dd91cffe798ba2fc498d67 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1570369
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: